Contract Cost Plus Percentage

joel hoffman on Thursday, December 20, 200111:43 am: Web, if we're talking about the 6"X9" yellow or tan book, 11/16" thick (Volume 1, 1986), or 3/8" thick (Volume 2, 1987), they are the wedding place in ohio 2 volume "Armed Services Pricing Manual".
The old ASPMs once were identified in this section and have now been replaced by the current guides. Just because the CPRG doesn't describe CPPC doesn't mean that it doen't exist. (DCAA Section 9-900 "Profit in Price Proposals.

Philip on Wednesday, December 19, 200111:28 am: I can find no rule linking travel to a specific type of contract arrangement to give any guidance in either the DCAA Audit Manual or the Contract Pricing Reference Guide. I did find some explanations using the Google search feature, that Bob just added to the site. None of my contractors have ever requested anything else. So what is done to avoid the %age of cost is to not allow profit at all on ODCs.
This information should be given somewhere in the Contract Pricing Reference Guide, but it isn't.
Most references simply state that it is prohibited in Federal contracting. Wednesday, December 19, 200110:53 am: Here is an idea you may wish to consider. We have some old stuff up there. "issued by direction of the Assistant Secretary of Defense Directive No.
joel hoffman on Thursday, December 20, 200101:58 pm: Philip, you are correct.
on Tuesday, December 18, 200106:28 pm: actuals. The current DoD pricing manuals address the current DoD profit development methodology. I negotiate the cost as a pass through item and pay actuals only. The contractor is arguing that their travel costs will be a significant portion of their total costs (probably true) and under any other contract type, these costs would not be excluded from the cost base before applying profit.

The "XX" portion includes his normal burdens; i. As I said in a previous post, I've never paid profit on travel. Since we can't use ASPM anymore (per FAR) as guidance, at least the GAO and Vern Edwards came through for us. The agreement may include an allowance or amount for administrative costs as well as actual travel costs and something for profit or fee, but not on a cost-plus-percentage-of-cost basis. Does the ASPM still exist? If so where. ODC is an allowable cost for fee base on a cost reimbursement or FFP contract.
However, In my opinion, paying profit as a direct percentage of travel costs on a T&M contract is the same as paying profit as a direct percentage of actual material costswhich isn't done, partly because it is a cost-plus-percentage of cost method of contracting. . I am sure someone can point it out from a specific court or Comptroller General caseI do not have Either you alone or you and an attorney apply converter currency free online the steps to your specific case.
I think the official title was the Armed Services Procurement Manual for Contract Pricing (ASPM 1). The reasoning concerning why such an approach would appear to be cost-plus-percentage of cost is analogous to the treatment of a direct percentage markup for profit on travel costs. It is structured for lump sum items and includes profit on materials.

To repeat, profit is not prohibited on child growing quote up travel costs.

Like Anon above, I too have never recalled a contractor requesting profit on ODCs, whether 8(a) or Fortune 500 in 20 years of T&M contracting. I believe this to be the convention within the industry when dealing T&Ms.
(3) Optional method of pricing material.
404-1 Proposal Analysis Techniques. The WGL method form we currently use can be found at: joel hoffman on Thursday, December 20, 200101:21 pm: I extracted this bit of advice "by Vern Edwards on Thursday, July 12, 200111:29 pm: It is precisely the four criteria to which we should pay attention.
That is, each hour of labor expended accrues a fixed rate of profit.
joel hoffman on Wednesday, December 19, 200110:17 am: application of the Contract Pricing Reference Guide to profit on a time and materials contract.

I was eventually led to believe that the ASPM was obsolete. on Thursday, December 20, 200101:15 pm: Forces Pricing Manual" is in a big tex grille guard 8 x 11 loose leaf format dated 1986, my vol II of the ASPM is the yellow paperback bound version dated 1987.
The "factor to apply to his travel costs" may be a G&A applied only once in the labor hour or separately as a G&A %age applied to actuals. There is a four step analysis for determining an illegal cost-plus-a-percentage-of-cost system of contracting. In the Federal Register June 20, 1996, FAC 90-39ACTION: Final SUMMARY: The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council have agreed on a final rule to amend the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to replace the Armed Services Pricing Manual, as the reference guide for pricing and negotiation personnel, with five desk references jointly prepared by the Air Force Institute of Technology and the Federal Acquisition Institute. The 1985 version was called the Armed Services Pricing Manual. I do not have an example because these things are so rare. happy sails! joel Wednesday, December 19, 200110:32 am: There is no rule about this. joel hoffman on Thursday, December 20, 200112:49 pm: Philip, I hope you're not relying on the new guidance to determine whether an element of a time and material contract is cost-plus percentage-of cost, because I can't find any discussion in the new guidance one way or the Doesn't mean that CPPC doesn't exist.

I hung onto these because the civilian agencies I've worked for use the old DoD weighted guidelines to this day and I found the ASPM valuable. Under other contractual circumstances would australia perth western zoo one allow profit/fee to be applied to ODCs, of course one would, the rate would normally be low (10% seems(?) it is excessive)but I'm from the old school womens winter dress coat where I've used the old DoD WGL to develop profit/fee objectives.
.
g during the 4 hour flight? If your paying the employee's labor while in a travel mode, I'd say travel costs sans profit/fee, whatever profit is to be realized is already in the loaded hourly labor rate.

Is this allowed? joel hoffman on Monday, December 17, 200102:33 pm: percentage of cost"to me.
601(b): (2) Material handling costs. This information is most valuable.
I also searched the DCAA audit manual and I can find no rule restricting profit on travel. However, they are not directive and should be considered informational only. The criteria were established by the GAO, it's the GAO that is most likely to rule on any CPPC issue, and the GAO has adhered to the four criteria for at least 46 years. " AND Section Section 7-1000 "Employee Travel The only indication given that profit is allowed on Travel is the structure of the Weighted Guidelines form/mechanism. I would not permit profit on ODCs like travel and materials. These references provide detailed discussion and examples applying america west las vegas vacation pricing policies to pricing problems. happy sails! joel webmaster on Thursday, December 20, 200111:33 am: webmaster on Thursday, December 20, 200111:35 am: I am going to go see if it is in the library.

I cannot remember the specifics. However, if the contractor's employee is in a travel mode and your not paying the hourly rate while that employee is on travel, then I would be gracious (considering that the contractor is one dumb *%*& for not insisting on a portal to portal arrangement knowing that travel is involved) when Philip on Tuesday, December 18, 200101:49 pm: The contract pricing reference guide allows profit on travel. In WGL profit is brand shelf top vodka allowed on Travel/ODCs. Dave Barnett on Tuesday, December 18, 200101:14 pm: I tink Smokey hit on the crux of the issue, travel expense in not a material handling issue, it's an ODC issue. Is travel to be billed at actual costs plus a percentage? happy sails! joel Smokey on Monday, December ca hotel in lancaster 17, 200103:18 pm: I have always included travel as an ODC item, exclusive of profit. XX to be applied against actual travel costs. happy sails! joel Philip on Thursday, December 20, 200110:56 am: If I'm taking information out of context, I'm not aware of it. Perhaps, we ought to suggest to the CPRG authors that they expand on the subject.
on Monday, December 17, 200104:04 pm: Yes, the contractor has proposed a factor of 1. Additionally, if the contractor insists on a fee, let the contractor know that if any other of the contractor's contracts are illegal in this sense, then those fees are recoverable by the government. If abuse rehab substance treatment you are convinced that it is an illegal cost-plus-a-percentage-of-cost system of contracting, then you cannot pay the fee. However, I had copies of that one and the 1985 version. .